USPTO serial 76249395
TIGERLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3199991Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIGERLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Isle of Man IM2 1QA, VG
Isle of Man IM2 1QA, VG
Isle of Man IM2 1QA, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Catherine Merz
MARY CATHERINE MERZ MERZ & ASSOCIATES, PC1140 LK ST STE 304OAK PARK, IL 60301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | (Based on 44(e) only) Golf carts and golf trolleys; and structural parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | (Based on 44(e) only) printed materials, namely, books and pamphlets featuring sports, namely, golf; and instructional books in the field of sports, namely, golf | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | (Based on 44(e) only) sporting goods, namely, golf clubs, golf balls, golf tees, golf caddies, golf bags, golf ball markers, golf club covers, golf club grips and golf mats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerline Golf Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerline Golf Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Tigerline Golf Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named TIGERLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |