USPTO serial 76249513
PETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine M. Baker
CHRISTINE M BAKER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY ET AL666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations; cosmetics and skin care preparations, namely, facial and body cleansers, skin moisturizers, hydrating creams for the face and body, facial and body lotions, facial and body scrubs, facial toners, beauty and body masks, skin lighteners, skin cleansing gels, skin moisturizing gels, sunscreen preparations, fragrances, namely, perfumes, toilet waters, colognes, and eau de colognes, and scented nonmedicated skin care preparations and cosmetics, namely, dusting powders, soaps, personal deodorants, after-shave, body washes, body oils, body lotions, bath gels, bath oils and bath beads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |