USPTO serial 76249525
OII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3114525Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Vernon, NY
Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Vernon, NY
Oneida Indian Nation of New York
Oneida, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melinda M. Lothes
Melinda M. Lothes Oneida Indian Nation Legal Department5218 Patrick RoadVerona, NY 13478UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming machines; computer hardware for gaming machines; computer software for operating gaming machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oneida Indian Nation of New York
- Other trademarks owned by Oneida Indian Nation of New York
- Other trademarks owned by Oneida Indian Nation of New York
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OII
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |