USPTO serial 76249554
STEVE WYNN'S DESERT INN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEVE WYNN'S DESERT INN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Whitney Thier
WHITNEY THIER GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 500 NLAS VEGAS, NV 89109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Casino services; golf course services; entertainment services, namely, live performances featuring live performances of a musical band and live performances of a musical band, singers, dancers, magicians, actors, acrobats, and comedians, integrated with prerecorded music and video; organizing athletic and sporting events, namely boxing matches, wrestling matches, team sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |