USPTO serial 76249601
HART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Mulcahy
ROBERT W MULCAHY ROBERT W MULCAHY ATTORNEY AT LAW2881 SCOTT BLVD # MS 2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95050-2549UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Plasma generating equipment and machines for the processing and production of semiconductor substrates, thin films, silicon discs and wafers; namely, epitaxial reactors, chemical vapor deposition reactors, physical vapor deposition reactors, plasma etchers, ion implanters, and chemical mechanical polishers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |