Drawing for SINGLERATE

USPTO serial 76249708

SINGLERATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SINGLERATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Russell H. Falconer

RUSSELL H FALCONER BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Wireless telecommunication services, namely, wireless telephone servicesACTIVEMar 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 3, 2004RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Sep 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Oct 3, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 3, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance