USPTO serial 76249789
MANIAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANIAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Knull, Vanessa Riviere, Marc S. Ullman
CHARLES H KNULL ULLMAN, SHAPIRO & ULLMAN299 BROADWAY STE 1700NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Sun block, non-medicated after sun skin balm, bronzers, suntanning preparations, sun screen, suntan oil and lotion, after-sun skin lotion, self-tanning lotion, and tanning accelerators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |