USPTO serial 76249944
IMAP4 STREAMING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAP4 STREAMING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Raanana 43654, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A TALLY EITAN
TALLY EITAN C/O LANDON & STARK ASSOCIATES INCSTE 2102011 CRYSTAL DRARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | UNIFIED MESSAGING SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF CENTRAL SERVER (USERS DATABASE), UC SERVERS AND COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ENABLE VOICE COMPRESSION, COMMUNICATION OVER NETWORKS, DATA AND MEDIA STREAMING AND CONVERSION OF DATA TO SPEECH IN REAL TIME; TELEPHONY MAIL SYSTEM, COMPOSED OF TELEPHONY MAIL SERVER, WEB MAIL SERVER, EMAIL SERVER, WAP MAIL SERVER, AND COMPUTER HARDWARE THAT HANDLES INCOMING VOICE AND FAX MESSAGES AND ENABLES THE SENDING OF FAX MESSAGES OR FORWARDING EMAILS TO FAX; PROGRAMS FOR ACCESSING COMPUTER NETWORKS AND THE GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |