Drawing for CLARITY ENABLED

USPTO serial 76250100

CLARITY ENABLED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARITY ENABLED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Cantor

MARK A CANTOR BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTRTWENTY-SECOND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for improving voice signal quality and the intelligibility of speech content used in voice interface systems, command and control systems, radio intercom systems and microphone systems, microphones and digital signal processors; microphone systems comprising a microphone unit and digital signal processorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 8, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance