USPTO serial 76250186
TRUE HYBRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUE HYBRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ
BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ CAPITOL300 CAPITOL MALL STE 1100SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4348UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Alternative energy systems utilizing renewable energy technologies such as solar (Photo voltaic), wind turbine, fuel cells and micro turbines to generate electricity RTI designs, engineers, furnishes and installs alternative energy systems that supply electricity to our customers and which feed the excess electrical energy generated back to the host utility | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1994 |
| 040 | Alternative energy systems utilizing renewable energy technologies such as solar (Photo voltaic), wind turbine, fuel cells and micro turbines to generate electricity RTI designs, engineers, furnishes and installs alternative energy systems that supply electricity to our customers and which feed the excess electrical energy generated back to the host utility | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |