USPTO serial 76250325
EVENT 1 INTEGRATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVENT 1 INTEGRATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Event 1 Integrator is an electronic translation and exchange program It is written in MS Visual Basic and runs in MS Windows 95 and above environments It takes information from a Cost Accounting application (eg, Timberline Software Accounting) and transforms it for exchange with a Project Management software application (eg, Meridian Project Systems Prolog Manager [tm]) This program also facilitates the exchange from Prolog to Timberline Specifically, it exchanges Vendors in Timberline with Companies in Prolog It sets up Budget Codes in Prolog from Work Breakdown Structure components in Timberline It sends estimated cost, summarized by Budget Code, from Timberline to Prolog It takes committed cost information from Prolog and creates this same information in Timberline Finally, it sends cost information from Timberline to Prolog | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |