Drawing for ONE ZONE NETWORKS

USPTO serial 76250396

ONE ZONE NETWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE ZONE NETWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER & HOSTTETLER LLPWASHINGTON SQ STE 11001050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized database managementACTIVE—
038Providing multiple user access to a global computer information networkACTIVE—
042Providing customized online web pages featuring user-defined information, which includes search engines and online web links to other websitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 23, 2011PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST—
Mar 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance