USPTO serial 76250413
GLUCAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLUCAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Lawrence
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional additives, namely, dietary fibers for use in animal feed, nutritional food additives, namely, dietary fiber for use in foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | food additives for non-nutritional purposes, namely, dietary fibers for use as flavoring, ingredients or fillers in foodstuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | animal feed additives for non-nutritional purposes, namely, dietary fibers for use as flavoring, ingredient or fillers in animal foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |