USPTO serial 76250512
SPYGLASS ENTERTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPYGLASS ENTERTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine L. Donohue
CATHERINE L DONOHUE GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLPJAMBOREE CTR 4 PARK PLZIRVINE, CA 92614-8557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Audio recording and production | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spyglass Entertainment Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Spyglass Entertainment Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SPYGLASS ENTERTAINMENT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |