USPTO serial 76250550
DADDY AND ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DADDY AND ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X, deRosa
Barth X. deRosa Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street NWSuite 1200Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unexposed camera film | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Disposable cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Photo albums, scrap books, and publications, namely, books in the field of parenting and children's books, arts and crafts paint kit sets, greeting cards, and paper baby bibs | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, plastic baby bibs, sleepwear, jackets, swimwear, children's cloth eating bibs, and baby layettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Balloons; children's multiple activity toys; arts and crafts kit comprised of mini-frames, punchout sheets, glitter glue, stickers, stars, and coloring implements to create personalized frames; role-play toys; interactive electronic toys with voice recording, playback, and voice altering functions; infant preschool toys, namely, action crib toys, musical toys, stacking and nesting toys; soft infant toys; bath toys; and puzzles | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Dried and live flower arrangements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mommy & Me Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MOMMY & ME COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks owned by MOMMY & ME COMPANY, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named DADDY AND ME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |