USPTO serial 76250561
CHIC-N-WINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2968822Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2005
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHIC-N-WINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
Mount Bethel, PA
Mount Bethel, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN FOX, ROTHSCHILD, O'BRIEN, & FRANKEL, LLP2000 MARKET ST TENTH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | breaded chicken breast meat formed into selected shapes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOWNSENDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OMTRON USA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pocono Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pocono Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CHIC-N-WINGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |