Drawing for Serial No. 76250613

USPTO serial 76250613

Serial No. 76250613

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76250613?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN R BERGERSON

STEPHEN R BERGERSON FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010EXTERNAL NASAL DILATORACTIVEOct 22, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 18, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance