Drawing for Serial No. 76250778

USPTO serial 76250778

Serial No. 76250778

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76250778?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Owen W. Dukelow

OWEN W DUKELOW KOLISCH HARTWELL DICKINSOPACIFIC BLDG520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1378

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028snow sleds for recreational useACTIVEMar 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 12, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 9, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance