Drawing for REVERSIBLE JEANS AND DENIMWEAR

USPTO serial 76251053

REVERSIBLE JEANS AND DENIMWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REVERSIBLE JEANS AND DENIMWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025apparel, namely, denim pants, skirts, jackets, shirts, vests and dressesACTIVEJun 10, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance