USPTO serial 76251299
U S WEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U S WEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine P. Searls, Gretchen L. Prochaska, David R. Halvorson
CHRISTINE P SEARLS GRETCHEN L PROCHAS QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC1801 CALIFORNIA ST #900DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR ROUTING LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE CALLS, CELLULAR CALLS, AND DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE CONNECTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE, DATA AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS PROVIDED BY WAY OF DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION, AND BUNDLED LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Qwest Communications International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Qwest Communications International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named U S WEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |