USPTO serial 76251568
TAXIVAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAXIVAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael G. Frey
MICHAEL G FREY KILLWORTH, GOTTMAR, HAGAN & SCHAEFF LLPONE S MAIN ST STE 1300ONE DAYTON CTRDAYTON, OH 45402-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motor vehicles modified for use by able-bodied, physically disabled or otherwise transportarionally disadvantaged people, namely, motor vehicles with wheelchair lifts, ramps and/or lowered floors, and motor vehicle retrofit conversion packages to modify motor vehicles with wheelchair lifts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |