USPTO serial 76251596
NUTRADENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUTRADENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Niagara Falls, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chewing gums and mints | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |