USPTO serial 76252156
TUKAWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUKAWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD FRIEDMAN
EDWARD FRIEDMAN TURNER AUBERT & FRIEDMAN, LLP8383 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 510BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211-2404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AND DATA BETWEEN PARTICIPANTS IN THE CUT AND SEW INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN, PLOTTING, MARKER MAKING AND MANUFACTURING IN THE CUT AND SEW INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |