USPTO serial 76252222
FESTIVAL CRUISES & F
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FESTIVAL CRUISES & F?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip G. Hampton
PHILIP G HAMPTON GARDNER CARTON DOUGLASK1301 K ST NW STE 900 EWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3370Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transport of passengers by ship, arranging of cruises, cruise ship services, tourist agency services, and travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation and arranging transportation to and from cruise ships | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hotel services, restaurant, bar and nightclub services, travel agency services, namely making reservations and booking for temporary lodging, and providing facilities for conferences and exhibitions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |