Drawing for UNISLEEVE

USPTO serial 76252239

UNISLEEVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNISLEEVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith Sapp

JUDITH SAPP KOMONDOROK LLC111 W STPORTLAND, ME 04102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Plastic bands, plastic shells, and plastic envelopes; plastic tubes and plastic film for marking, packaging, and wrapping, not for commercial or industrial useACTIVE—
017Plastic film, plastic bands, plastic shells, plastic envelopes, and plastic tubes for industrial and commercial marking, packing, and wrapping; plastic non-mechanical, non-metal seals, namely, bands, shells, envelopes, and tubes for safety and inviolability purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 29, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance