USPTO serial 76252722
USWEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with USWEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine P. Searls, Gretchen L. Prochaska, David R. Halvorson
CHRISTINE P SEARLS GRETCHEN L PROCHAS QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC1801 CALIFORNIA ST #900DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE, DATA AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS PROVIDED BY WAY OF DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) AND WIRELESS TRANSMISSION; BUNDLED LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Qwest Communications International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Qwest Communications International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named USWEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |