USPTO serial 76252766
KOHLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOHLER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Lash
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER, JR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER, P.C.1160 SPA ROAD, SUITE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN | ABANDONED | Feb 13, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |