USPTO serial 76252848
SS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Songpa-ku Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele, Jr.
J RODMAN STEELE JR AKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, PA222 LAKEVIEW AVE FOURTH FLPOST OFFICE BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-1388Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | belt buckles of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | leather goods, trunks, bags and umbrellas,namely portable cosmetic cases not filled with any contents; fur pelts; imitation fur pelts; imitation leather sold in bulk; leather key cases, bag for mountain-climbing, knapsacks; rucksacks, boston bags, non-precious materials purses, brief cases, suitcases, traveling bags, traveling trunks, opera bags, student's bags, handbags; leather covers for furniture, leather covers for fur coats; beach parasols, parasols, umbrellas; sticks for mountain-climbing, walking sticks; leather straps for skates | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | leather boxes | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | clothing, shoes and hats, namely leather shoes, golf shoes, basketball shoes, low shoes, mountain climbing shoes, bath sandals, bath slippers, half boots, boots, vinyl shoes, sandals, ski shoes, slippers, baseball shoes, field-sneakers, football shoes; sport anoraks, gymnastic suits; horse riding pants; school uniforms, long coats, breeches, half coats, safari. suits, skirts, men's suits, anoraks, children's clothing, namely shirts, shorts, pants and coats; trousers, overcoats, one-piece dresses, jackets, overalls; jumpers, blue jeans, capes, comb-suits, two-piece dresses, parkas; jeogori (Korean jackets), Korean skirts; girdles, nightgowns, aloha shirts, bathrobes, bodyshirts, brassieres, blouses, underwear, underpants, undershirts, briefs, swimming caps, swimming suits, swimming pants, chemises, sweaters, sweatshirts, sport shirts, slips, T-shirts, clothing collars, night shirts, vests, cardigans, combinations, pajamas, panty stockings, polo shirts, T-shirts, neckties, neckpieces, gloves, mittens, scarves, stockings, socks, tights; nightcaps, hats, berets; leather belts, suspenders | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | belt buckles not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shin, Kyu Ho
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named SS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |