Drawing for MAGIC RULER

USPTO serial 76252909

MAGIC RULER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGIC RULER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer products, namely, computer game programs; video game cartridges; video game CD-ROMS; video game machines for use with televisions; computer game CD-ROMS; video game programs; video game programs for use with television sets; video game joysticks; prerecorded video tapes featuring information, news, rules, hints and strategy about card games, electronic games, computer games and video gamesABANDONED—
016Brochures and booklets relating to computer and video games; video game strategy guide books; video game strategy guide magazines; card game strategy guide books; card game strategy guide magazines; card game instruction books; card game instruction magazines; posters; playing cards and instruction manual sold therewith; computer game instruction manuals; printed game instruction sheets; printed scoring sheets; trading cards; calendars; loose-leaf binders and stationeryABANDONED—
028Stand-alone video game machines; hand-held units for playing electronic games; board games and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; card games; dice; promotional game materials; game equipment, namely, chips; toys, namely action figures; dolls and playsets thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 5, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 5, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 1, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance