USPTO serial 76252973
PECAS PRECOS VW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PECAS PRECOS VW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-38436 Wolfsburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | LAND VEHICLES; NAMELY, AUTOMOBILES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, TRUCKS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR; MOTORS FOR AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS; AND PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR LAND VEHICLES AND MOTORS THEREFOR, NAMELY, STEERING GEARS, MECHANICAL STEERING COLUMNS, BELT TENSION PULLEYS, BEARINGS, EXTERNAL CONIC BEARINGS, REAR WHEEL BEARINGS, DOUBLE PINION BEARINGS, REAR SHAFT AXLES, CLUTCH CABLES, ALTERNATOR VEE BELTS, METAL CUSHIONS, CLUTCH DISKS, BRAKE DISKS, EXTERIOR REAR VIEW MIRRORS, BRAKE CHIP SETS, HELICOIDAL SPRINGS, SUSPENSION HELICOIDAL SPRINGS, WINDSHIELDS WITH ANTENNAE, PINIONS, CLUTCH ROLLERS, REAR BUMPER SUPPORTS, FUEL NOZZLE COVERS, WINDSHIELD WIPER FLUID RESERVOIRS AND GLASS WINDOWS FOR VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |