Drawing for PACIFICARE.COM

USPTO serial 76253094

PACIFICARE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PACIFICARE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROD S. BERMAN

ROD S BERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP2121 AVE OF THE STARS FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-5010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MANAGED CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF HEALTH CARE INFORMATION FOR HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS; RETAIL SALE OF HEALTH PLANS AND ANCILLARY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
036PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING HEALTH CARE INSURANCE VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING GRANTS PROVIDED TO NON-PROFIT AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS FOR CHILD AND YOUTH ACTIVITY PROGRAMS, EDUCATION PROGRAMS, HEALTH PROMOTION AND WELLNESS PROGRAMS, HUMAN AND SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS AND SENIOR PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDNG ON-LINE MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH CARE, HEALTH CARE INSURANCE, AND LIFESTYLES; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING HEALTH CARE AND ANCILLARY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance