Drawing for COTTON SCRUBS & CO.

USPTO serial 76253347

COTTON SCRUBS & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COTTON SCRUBS & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME COMISKY & MCCAULEY1 LOGAN SQ FL 3PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL SALE OF CLOTHING AND MEDICAL UNIFORMS; AND MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, SHOES, UNIFORMS, MEDICAL UNIFORMS, MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, AND MEDICAL ACCESSORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance