Drawing for THE PRIME OF OUR LIVES

USPTO serial 76253388

THE PRIME OF OUR LIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PRIME OF OUR LIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane E. Pinzow-Naidoff

JANE E PINZOW-NAIDOFF HALE AND DORR LLP300 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH, HEALTH AWARENESS AND HEALTH ISSUES RELATED TO WOMEN OVER THE AGE OF FORTY-FIVEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 9, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 7, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 6, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 6, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance