USPTO serial 76253397
LOCK/ LINE CUSTOMER PROTECTION BY LOCKTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOCK/ LINE CUSTOMER PROTECTION BY LOCKTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Prairie Village, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maurice B. Stiefel
CHRISTOPHER J HAYES BRYAN CAVE LLPSTE 3600211 N BROADWAYST LOUIS, MO 63102-2750Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | administering, servicing, providing and managing manufacturer warranties, extended warranties, equipment maintenance programs, and services contracts with respect to telecommunications, retail consumer goods, home appliances and systems and automobiles including customer enrollment, adjudication, program development and financial reconciliation; administering, servicing, providing and managing debt cancellation, debt deferment, debt suspension and credit insurance programs, including customer enrollment, cancellation and claim adjudication, program development and financial reconciliation in the fields of consumer installment plans, credit cards, and home equity and mortgage lending | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Equipment maintenance programs, namely, maintenance of telecommunications, computers, retail consumer goods, home appliances and systems, and automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |