USPTO serial 76253426
CAESAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAESAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
78000, Versailles, FR
78000, Versailles, FR
78000, Versailles, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger W. Parkhurst
Roger W. Parkhurst Steptoe & Johnson, LLP1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MILITARY EARTH WHEELED OR TRACKED VEHICLES, NAMELY TRUCKS, TRACTORS, TRACTION TOWERS; AIR LOCOMOTION VEHICLES, NAMELY MILITARY AIRCRAFT, FREIGHT PLANES, FIGHTER PLANES, HELICOPTERS, AND UNMANNED AIRBORNE VEHICLES, NAMELY UNMANNED AIRBORNE DRONES, AND REMOTELY OPERATED AERIAL VEHICLES; WATER LOCOMOTION VEHICLES, NAMELY MILITARY SHIPS, FAST [ VENDETTAS] * VEDETTES * , FREIGHTERS, SUBMARINES; VEHICLES, NAMELY TRUCKS, TRACTORS AND TANKS ALL WEAPON SYSTEM EQUIPPED, ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUN EQUIPPED, MORTAR EQUIPPED, GRENADE LAUNCHER EQUIPPED, GUN EQUIPPED, ROCKET LAUNCHER EQUIPPED, MISSILE LAUNCHER EQUIPPED, SELF-ACTING ARTILLERY EQUIPPED, FIELD ARTILLERY EQUIPPED AND PARTS THEREOF | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 013 | FIREARMS, NAMELY, RIFLES, PISTOLS, GRENADE LAUNCHERS, ROCKET LAUNCHERS, NON RECOIL GUNS; AUTOMATIC WEAPONS, NAMELY MACHINE GUNS AND SUBMACHINE GUNS; MEDIUM CALIBER EQUIPPED GUNS; ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUN'S DEFENSE, NAMELY ANTI-AIRCRAFT TURRETS, TOWED ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUNS; NEAR DEFENSE GUN; GUN TURRETS; MORTARS; FIELD ARTILLERY; MULTIPLE ROCKET LAUNCHERS; TURRETS FOR NAVAL GUNS; AMMUNITIONS AND PROJECTILES, NAMELY MEDIUM-BORE CARTRIDGE, GRENADES, ARTILLERY'S SHELLS, MORTAR'S SHELLS, KINETIC PROJECTILES, MISSILES, ROCKETS, BOMBS, TORPEDOES; WEAPONS SET UP ON A VEHICLE, NAMELY, GUN EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TANK, GUN EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRUCK, ARTILLERY EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRUCK, MORTAR EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRUCK, GUN ATTACHMENT TO A TRACTOR, MORTAR EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRACTOR, ROCKET LAUNCHER EQUIPPED FOR ATTACHMENT TO A TRUCK; EXPLOSIVES, NAMELY, HIGH EXPLOSIVES, INITIATING EXPLOSIVES, SECONDARY EXPLOSIVES, COMPOSITE EXPLOSIVES, AND EXPLOSIVE LOADING; FIREWORKS; ARMORED TANKS AS WEAPONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |