USPTO serial 76253581
SS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Songpa-ku Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodman Steele
J RODMAN STEELE LAKEVIEWAKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, PAP O BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Covers of textile for furniture and household items, namely, covers for laundry machines, curtains of textile or plastic (except for shower curtains), television covers, piano covers, quilts, mattress covers, bed blankets, bed covers, cushion covers; handkerchiefs of textile, towels of textile; silk fabric, cotton fabric, woolen cloth, artificial sweat fabric, embroidery fabric, synthetic fiber fabric, mixed hempen fabric, chemical fiber union cloth | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Shoe accessories, namely, shoe hooks, shoe buckles, shoe ornaments (not of precious metal), laces (except for embroidered laces); hair ribbons, hair pins, barrettes; belt ornaments, namely, pins, spangles; buckles and brooches for clothing; ornamental ribbons, hair grips and hair bands; buttons, hooks and snaps for clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |