Drawing for FUSION SAGE

USPTO serial 76253640

FUSION SAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUSION SAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer products, namely, computer game programs; video game cartridges; video game CD-ROMS; video game machines for use with televisions; computer game CD-ROMS; video game programs; video game programs for use with television sets; video game joysticksACTIVE—
016Brochures and booklets relating to computer and video games; video game strategy guide books; video game strategy guide magazines; card game strategy guide books; card game strategy guide magazines; card game instruction books; card game instruction magazines; playing cards and instruction manual sold therewith; computer game instruction manuals; printed game instruction sheets; printed scoring sheets; calendarsACTIVE—
028Stand-alone video game machines; hand-held units for playing electronic games; board games and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; card games; dice; promotional game materials; game equipment, namely, chips; toys, namely, action figures, dolls and playsets thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 29, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance