USPTO serial 76253654
DAY FOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAY FOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NATALYA L. ROSE
Natalya L. Rose Milom Joyce Horsnell Crow PLC3310 West End AvenueSuite 610Nashville, TN 37203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely, a magazine in the field of religion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |