USPTO serial 76253753
RX COSMETIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATEJA, JOANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RX COSMETIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Krizan,
LISA M KRIZAN HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER WEINBERG ET AL701 E BYRD ST FL 17RICHMOND, VA 23219-4528UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated cosmetics namely, skin, hand, facial, hair, body, non-medicated sunburn and foot lotions and oils, sunscreens, skin gels, lotions and creams for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, salves, shampoos, body, skin, facial, deodorant and anti-perspirant sprays, bath, skin, styling, eye, dental, and hair gels, facial, body, cold, eye, hand, night, shaving, skin cleansing, wrinkle vanishing, cuticle, hair removal, hair growth, lip and nail creams, skin bleaching preparations, antiaging preparations and skin depigmentation preparations, topical protectants and non-medicated acne treatment preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |