USPTO serial 76253758
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
34-02 MILLENIA TOWER, SG
Liverpool L9 7LD, GB
Liverpool L9 7LD, GB
Liverpool L9 7LD, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JULIUS RABINOWITZ
Julius Rabinowitz Hughes Hubbard & Reed1 Battery Park Plaza, Fl 12New York, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Puffed rice, flours, sweet and salted tarts and pies; preparations made of cereals, breakfast cereals; plain, coated, filled, and flavored bread, rusks, sweet and savory, wafers, waffles, cakes, pastries; sweet or salted appetizers comprising bread, biscuit or pastry dough; edible ices, ice creams, frozen flavored water; sweet sauces, pasta sauces, spices, excluding fresh fruit and vegetables | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |