Drawing for RITTENHOUSE

USPTO serial 76254076

RITTENHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RITTENHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manny D. Pokotilow

MANNY D POKOTILOW COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD12TH1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2217

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018HANDBAGS, PURSES, WALLETS, ATTACHE CASES AND BRIEFCASESACTIVEOct 18, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 19, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance