USPTO serial 76254076
RITTENHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RITTENHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD12TH1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2217Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS, PURSES, WALLETS, ATTACHE CASES AND BRIEFCASES | ACTIVE | Oct 18, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |