USPTO serial 76254366
A FUNK ODYSSEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A FUNK ODYSSEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Piltdown, East Sussex, GB
London SW6 4EN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Anderson
KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films; pre-recorded video cassettes, video tape, video discs, audio cassettes, audio tapes and audio discs, all featuring entertainment in the nature of comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; interactive video and multimedia game programs; and computer software for games, gaming machines, websites, Internet applications, transmission of information, video and audio sequences and/or data featuring entertainment in the nature of comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |