USPTO serial 76254563
PATIO ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATIO ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Freilich
ARTHUR FREILICH FREILICH HORNBAKER & ROSEN9045 CORBIN AVE STE 206NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324-3300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Table cloths not of paper; unfitted fabric furniture covers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Heptner, Roxanne
- Other trademarks owned by Heptner, Roxanne
- Other trademarks owned by Pereira, Arthur
- Other trademarks owned by Pereira, Arthur
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named PATIO ART
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |