USPTO serial 76254613
HIBACHIBBQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3750942Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HIBACHIBBQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, CA
Mississauga, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Propane Gas Barbeques and Natural Gas Barbeques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liatsis, Gail
- Other trademarks owned by Liatsis, Gail
- Other trademarks owned by HIBACHI CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HIBACHI CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HIBACHI CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named HIBACHIBBQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | RG1B | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |