Drawing for BEEP-IT

USPTO serial 76254801

BEEP-IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEEP-IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garrett C. Donley

GARRETT C DONLEY HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PERSONAL SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF AN ELECTRONIC SECURITY ALARM, AN ELECTRONIC PAGER, AND AN ELECTRONIC ALARM CLOCKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 19, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2005LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Mar 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance