USPTO serial 76254847
CLEANSING MIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2002
- Examiner
- DUMONT, GREGORY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEANSING MIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schuman
David J. Schuman Church & Dwight Co., Inc.469 North Harrison StreetLaw DepartmentPrinceton, NJ 08543Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Spray nozzles as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of lacerations, bruises, dryness, and irritations of the eyes, skin, olfactory organs, esophageal tract, respiratory tract and other body orifices; spray nozzles as an integral component of pharmaceutical preparations for the cleaning and healing of wounds; and spray nozzles as an integral component of nasal spray preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLAIREX LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLAIREX LABORATORIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CLEANSING MIST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |