USPTO serial 76254882
LIQUID AUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIQUID AUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEM LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO AMPLIFIERS, AUDIO SPEAKERS, GUITAR AMPLIFIERS AND SPEAKERS, AUDIO LOUDSPEAKERS, VEHICLE COMPACT DISC/AUDIO CASSETTE/AM/FM PLAYERS, VEHICLE STEREO SPEAKERS, VEHICLE AUDIO AMPLIFIERS, VEHICLE AUDIO EQUALIZERS AND VEHICLE PRO-AUDIO WOOFERS, VEHICLE ISOBARIC WOOFERS, VEHICLE HIGH PERFORMANCE WOOFERS, VEHICLE COAXIAL FULL RANGE SPEAKERS, VEHICLE TWO-WAY COMPONENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING A CONE MADE OF POLYPROPYLENE WITH A SILVER COIL, VOICE COIL MADE OF ALUMINUM; VOICE COIL HAVING A CIRCULAR RING AROUND THE COMPOSITE CONE MADE OF BUTYL RUBBER WITH A SOFT SILK DOME TWEETER, VEHICLE COAXIAL FULL RANGE SPEAKER, VEHICLE TRIAXIAL FULL RANGE SPEAKER, VEHICLE AMPLIFIERS, VEHICLE HIGH CURRENT AMPLIFIERS, VEHICLE SINGLE BAND PASS WOOFERS, VEHICLE ANGLE HATCHBACK DYNAMIC PROPYLENE WOOFERS, VEHICLE SPEAKER AND DUAL AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS IN ONE, AND HIGH QUALITY VEHICLE AMPLIFIER AND SPEAKER PACKAGE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |