USPTO serial 76254929
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
36051 CREAZZO (Vicenza), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVEP O BOX 900RDIVERDALE BRONX, NY 10471| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather goods and articles made thereof, namely animal skins, bags, handbags, suitcases, travelling bags, trunks, travelling cases, purses, rucksacks, briefcases, wallets, leather key-cases, shoulder belts, bag handles and similar good made of leather or its imitation thereof | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |