Drawing for BETFLEX THE CONCRETE PANEL THAT WORKS LIKE WOOD

USPTO serial 76254953

BETFLEX THE CONCRETE PANEL THAT WORKS LIKE WOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETFLEX THE CONCRETE PANEL THAT WORKS LIKE WOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ms. Paulette Carey

MS PAULETTE CAREY BUCHMAN & O'BRIEN, LLP510 THORNALL ST STE 200EDISON, NJ 08837UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Building materials, namely, multi-layer, fiber-reinforced, flexible cement panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Dec 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 13, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 29, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance