Drawing for PURA VITTA

USPTO serial 76254978

PURA VITTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURA VITTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian P. Carvajal

IAN P CARVAJAL SALDAFIA & CARVAJAL PSCVIG TWR STE 7021225 PONE DE LEON AVESAN JUAN, PR 00907-3907

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Noni fruit juice, concentrate tablets for making carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic malt beverages, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic fruit extracts for making soft drinks, fruit juices, fruit nectars, vegetable juices beverages, aerated waters, syrups for making soft drinks, lemonades, carbonated soft drinks, soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 200144DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance